Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23831 (CHH)

MADAN SEN @ CHANDRAHAS SEN v. CHHATTISGARH ENVIRONMENT CONSERVATION BOARD

WPC/2031/2019 · 2025-02-07

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:7045 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2031 of 2019 1 - Madan Sen @ Chandrahas Sen S/o Shri Ramkisun Sen Aged About 45 Years R/o Gandhi Chowk Radhika Nagar, Supela Bhilai Tahsil And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - Chhattisgarh Environment Conservation Board Through Its President Address Paryavas Bhavan, North Block, Sector-19 Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Municipal Corporation Bhilai Through Its Commissioner, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 3 - Government Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Collector, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 4 - M/s Micro Transmission System Through Its Manager, Address, C-23, Sector-85, Near India Tv, Noida, Uttar Pradesh Pin- 201305, District : Noida, Uttar Pradesh ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Shikhar Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Shri Animesh Tiwari, Advocate/ For Respondent No.2 : Shri H.B. Agrawal, Senior Advocate with Shri Rakshit Tiwari, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri Vedant Shadangi, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 07.02.2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking for the following reliefs: Digitally signed by SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- “10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ including Writ of mandamus to quash the Permission issued by the Respondent No.1 vide ANNEXURE P-1, and consequently cancel the work order issued by the Respondent No.2 in favor of the Respondent No.4, that is, ANNEXURE P-6. 10.2 Writ including writ of mandamus to the Respondent No.2 to abide by its meeting recorded ANNEXURE P-2, pursuantly stopping the modernization of the slaughterhouse at Radhika Nagar, Bhilai and moving the same to an appropriate location. 10.3 Any other relief/relief's which this Hon'ble court may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, with cost of the petition may also be pleased to be granted to the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 would submit that a direction was issued to the Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, to shut down the Slaughter House on 11.11.2019 (Annexure-R/2), and thus, this petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would not dispute the contention made by counsel for respondent No.1. 4. Taking into consideration the above submissions made by the respective counsels, this petition is disposed of, as the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi