Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23829 (RAJ)

KUNTI DEVI W/O SEDHURAM YADAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10776/2022 · 2025-01-28

Sudesh Bansal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:3898] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10776/2022 1. Kunti Devi W/o Sedhuram Yadav, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Bichpuri, Gram Panchayat Mohabbatpur, Tehsil Malakhera, District Alwar, (Hall Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mohabbatpur). 2. Rohitash Chaudhary S/o Balram Chaudhary, R/o Village Mohabbatpur, Tehsil Malakhera, District Alwar, (Hall Ward Member, Gram Panchayat Mohabbatpur). 3. Ramdhan Saini S/o Bhoren Lal Saini, R/o Village Bichpuri, Gram Panchayat Mohabbatpur, Tehsil Malakhera, District Alwar, (Hall Ward Member, Gram Panchayat Mohabbatpur). 4. Chaukha Devi W/o Sedhuram Prajapat, R/o Village Mohabbatpur, Tehsil Malakhera, District Alwar, (Hall Ward Member, Gram Panchayat Mohabbatpur). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Cooperative Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Registrar, Department Of Co-Operative Society, Nehru Sahkar Bhavan, 22 Godown, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur 3. Joint Registrar, Department Of Co-Operative Society, Nehru Sahkar Bhavan, 22 Godown, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur 4. Joint Secretary (Planning), Department Of Co-Operative Society, Nehru Sahkar Bhavan, 22 Godown, Bhawani Singh Road, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anupam Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Padam Singh Gurjar, AGC Mr. Suresh Kumar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 28/01/2025 1. Counsel for petitioners states that the Headquarter of Gram Seva Cooperative Society was changed and in that respect, instant writ petition was filed, however, during course of this writ petition, Headquarter has been retained at the previous place, hence in such view, petitioners do not want to pursue the writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. [2025:RJ-JP:3898] (2 of 2) [CW-10776/2022] 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Since, the writ petition itself has been dismissed as withdrawn, the application (IA No.1/2024), seeking impleadment in the present writ petition, is also dismissed accordingly. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/81