( 2025:JHHC:10462 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5509 of 2024 ------ 1. Subhash Turi @ Subhas Kumar Turi, aged about 26 years, son of Harilal Turi 2. Ganesh Turi, aged about 39 years, son of late Ram Kishun Turi 3. Hiralal Turi @ Harilal Turi, aged about 45 years, son of late Khublal Turi 4. Sukhlal Turi @ Khublal Turi, aged about 67 years, son of late Pyari Turi 5. Ratan Turi @ Ritlal Turi, aged about 51 years, son of late Pyari Turi 6. Kanhaiya Turi @ Kanhai Turi, aged about 49 years, son of Late Prayag Turi 7. Mukesh Turi @ Mukesh Kumar Turi, aged about 27 years, son of Sukhlal Turi All residents of Village –Barasoli, P.O. & P.S. Bengabad, District –Giridih. … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shree Nivas Roy, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Mahua Palit, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.04 Dated- 03.04.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.275 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 384, 385, 504, 506 & 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant and demanded extortion of Rs.2,00,000/- and also committed theft of a silver chain. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false. It is next submitted that for the selfsame occurrence, from the side of the petitioners, the petitioner no.3 lodged SC/ST P.S. Case No. 15 of 2024. It is further submitted that the entire family members of the petitioners have been implicated in this case only to harass them. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.275 of 2023 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile number and a copy of their Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-