Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23827 (RAJ)

ALI HASAN S/O CHANDAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8691/2025 · 2025-07-12

Ashutosh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:25953] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8691/2025 Ali Hasan S/o Chandan Singh, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Near Bhartiyam School, Sikri Road, Govindgarh, District Alwar (Raj.). (At Present Lodge At District Jail Alwar District Alwar, (Raj.). ----Accused/Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant : Mr. Sudhir Yadav, Adv. For Respondent : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 12/07/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed by the accused- applicant under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 against the order dated 02.07.2025 passed by learned Special Judge, Sessions Court, Prevention of Corruption Act, Alwar in Bail Application No.17/2025 arising out of FIR No.149/2025, registered at C.P.S., Jaipur, Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur for the offences punishable under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption (Amended) Act, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 2018') by which the bail application of the accused-applicant under Section 483 of B.N.S.S., 2023 has been dismissed. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the accused-applicant has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant also submits that the allegation against the accused-applicant is for taking bribe of [2025:RJ-JP:25953] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8691/2025] Rs.3,000/- from the complainant for arranging licence of his shop 'Kisan Sewa Kendra'. Learned counsel argues that no other criminal case is registered against the accused-applicant. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant contends that in this matter, no further investigation is required to be done with regard to the accused-applicant and trial will take long time to conclude. Learned counsel further contends that the accused- applicant was arrested on 13.06.2025 and since then, he is behind the bars, therefore, the accused-applicant be enlarged on bail. 4. In support of his contentions, learned counsel for the accused-applicant places reliance on the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Abhishek Sharma S/o Govind Sharma Vs. State of Rajasthan (S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.5059/2025 & other connected matter), decided on 14.05.2025. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State while vehemently opposing this bail application submits the factual report dated 11.07.2025. The factual report dated 11.07.2025 is taken on record. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record. 7. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case; the age and period of custody of the accused-applicant; trial will take long time to conclude and the fact that no other criminal case is registered against the accused-applicant, but without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it proper to allow the bail application filed by the applicant. [2025:RJ-JP:25953] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8691/2025] 8. Consequently, this bail application filed under Section 483 of the B.N.S.S., 2023 is allowed. It is ordered that accused-applicant Ali Hasan S/o Chandan Singh, arrested in connection with FIR No.149/2025, registered at C.P.S., Jaipur, Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- and two solvent attested sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court. Applicant will be required to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /73