Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23826 (RAJ)

DR. K.L. YADAV S/O SHRI KESHAV SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10410/2025 · 2025-07-14

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26008] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10410/2025 Dr. K.L. Yadav S/o Shri Keshav Singh, Aged About 65 Years, Resident Of Plot No. K-1/1, LIC Flats Sector-06, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Animal Husbandry, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Directorate, Tonk Road, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Saxena with Ms. Neha Swami and Mr. Bhuwnesh Tiwari For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 14/07/2025 This matter pertains to benefit of sixth/seventh pay commission as also for benefit of selection scale/Assured Career progression(ACP) on completion of 10/20/30 years of service and revise the retiral benefits accordingly. Indisputably, the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious remedy before the Rajasthan Civil Services Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur. However, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel contended if he is permitted to file a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) who may be directed to decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law. [2025:RJ-JP:26008] (2 of 2) [CW-10410/2025] In view of the nature of prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration an order of a coordinate Bench of this Court dated 02.02.2024 passed in the case of Pawan Meena versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: SB Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this writ petition is disposed of in following terms without issuing notices to the respondents:- 1. The petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation with the respondents for redressal of his grievance(s) within a period of four weeks from today. 2. The respondents are directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order thereupon within a period of eight weeks from the date of its receipt in accordance with law with communication of the decision to the petitioner. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/25