[2025:RJ-JP:30248] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8571/2025 Manju Devi W/o Pappulal, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Khari Kothi, Dausa, P.S. Kotwali Dausa, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8953/2025 Hemraj S/o Kanhaiyalal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bhakto Ki Shani, Ward No. 12, Kasba Lalsot, P.S. Lalsot, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Chhavi Chaturvedi, Adv., with Mr. Krishan Kant Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/08/2025 1. The instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.265/2025 registered at Police Station Lalsot, District Dausa for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. [2025:RJ-JP:30248] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8571/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. She further submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. She argues that the petitioners are in custody since 22.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners- 1. Manju Devi W/o Pappulal and 2. Hemraj S/o Kanhaiyalal shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court [2025:RJ-JP:30248] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8571/2025] to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of these instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/226-227