Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 23820 (RAJ)
LALCHAND S/O NANCHHILAL v. HANUMAN SAHAY S/O JHUNTHALAL
CW/10215/2025 · 2025-08-04
Sameer Jain
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23820 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23820 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:29679] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10215/2025 Lalchand S/o Nanchhilal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Boytabala, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Hanuman Sahay S/o Jhunthalal, R/o Village Boytabala, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. Gram Panchayat, Through Secretary, Boytabala, Tehsil And District Jaipur.
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Jaipur, Tehsil And District Jaipur.
4. Babulal, S/o Jhuntha
5. Surgyan, S/o Jhuntha
6. Tejpal, S/o Anandilal
7. Madanlal, S/o Anandilal
8. Kalu, S/o Nanchhilal @ Naanchhilal
9. Gothi Devi, W/o Nanchhilal @ Naanchhilal
10. Kana, S/o Nathu
11. Jagdish, S/o Nathu
12. Chittar, S/o Gangu
13. Kilyan, S/o Gangu
14. Chandalal, S/o Gangu
15. Kaushalaya, R/o Surgyan
16. Bholi Devi, W/o Babulal
17. Mangali Devi, W/o Kalyan
18. Mohri Devi, W/o Jagdish
19. Lada Devi, W/o Chandalal
20. Shyoji @ Shyani Devi, W/o Kanaram
21. Sharvani Devi, W/o Chittar
22. Babulal, S/o Jhuntha
23. Sanjya Devi W/o Hanuman, All Are R/o Village Boytabala, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents
[2025:RJ-JP:29679] (2 of 2) [CW-10215/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aaditya Joshi, Adv.for Mr. Rajeer Kumar Sogarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 04/08/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /57