Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23820 (RAJ)

LALCHAND S/O NANCHHILAL v. HANUMAN SAHAY S/O JHUNTHALAL

CW/10215/2025 · 2025-08-04

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29679] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10215/2025 Lalchand S/o Nanchhilal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Boytabala, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Hanuman Sahay S/o Jhunthalal, R/o Village Boytabala, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Gram Panchayat, Through Secretary, Boytabala, Tehsil And District Jaipur. 3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Jaipur, Tehsil And District Jaipur. 4. Babulal, S/o Jhuntha 5. Surgyan, S/o Jhuntha 6. Tejpal, S/o Anandilal 7. Madanlal, S/o Anandilal 8. Kalu, S/o Nanchhilal @ Naanchhilal 9. Gothi Devi, W/o Nanchhilal @ Naanchhilal 10. Kana, S/o Nathu 11. Jagdish, S/o Nathu 12. Chittar, S/o Gangu 13. Kilyan, S/o Gangu 14. Chandalal, S/o Gangu 15. Kaushalaya, R/o Surgyan 16. Bholi Devi, W/o Babulal 17. Mangali Devi, W/o Kalyan 18. Mohri Devi, W/o Jagdish 19. Lada Devi, W/o Chandalal 20. Shyoji @ Shyani Devi, W/o Kanaram 21. Sharvani Devi, W/o Chittar 22. Babulal, S/o Jhuntha 23. Sanjya Devi W/o Hanuman, All Are R/o Village Boytabala, Tehsil And District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:29679] (2 of 2) [CW-10215/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aaditya Joshi, Adv.for Mr. Rajeer Kumar Sogarwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 04/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw the present petition. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /57