SAKEEL @ MOHAD SHAKEEL AMED @ KALA S/O ISMAEEL @ ISMAIL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/8772/2025 · 2025-08-08
Maneesh Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23812 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23812 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:30656] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous IInd Bail Application No. 8772/2025 Sakeel @ Mohad Shakeel Amed @ Kala S/o Ismaeel @ Ismail, Aged About 34 Years and 10 months, R/o Kathol, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through its Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 08/08/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (B.N.S.S.) on behalf of the accused/applicant. The accused has been arrested in connection with FIR No.322/2022 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Bharatpur, for the offence(s) under Sections 417, 419, 420, 471, 473 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 66D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (I.T. Act).
2.
Learned counsel for the accused submits that the accused has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed in this case on 16.06.2025; the offences are triable by Magistrate; and the accused is in judicial custody since 21.03.2025. He further submits that co- accused Mohammad Naseem has already been released on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 14.12.2022;
[2025:RJ-JP:30656] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8772/2025] and another co-accused Mustfa @ Mushti has already been released on bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Bharatpur on 07.01.2025; and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, while claiming parity with the other co-accused, the bail application of the accused may kindly be allowed. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that looking to the seriousness of the crime, the accused may not be released on bail and the bail application of the accused may kindly be dismissed. 4. Heard learned counsel for both parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the accused is in judicial custody since 21.03.2025; charge-sheet has already been filed in this matter on 16.06.2025; the offences are triable by Magistrate and the co-accused Mohammad Naseem has already been released on bail on 14.12.2022 by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and other co-accused Mustfa @ Mushti has already been released on bail by the learned Sessions Judge, Bharatpur on 07.01.2025; and that the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused on bail. 6. Accordingly, this second bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-Sakeel @ Mohad Shakeel Amed @ Kala S/o Ismaeel @ Ismail, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the
[2025:RJ-JP:30656] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8772/2025] satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7.
7. It is made clear that the accused shall not involve in any offence(s) of a similar nature during the currency of this bail and he shall mark his presence in the first week of every two months in concerned police station till the trial is concluded. 8. The accused shall also not tamper with any evidence nor would influence the witnesses in the case. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or comes to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel this bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the accused. In case, the accused fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is
directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /1