IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 11549 of 2024 Date of Decision:04.07.2025 _______________________________________________________ Kishori Lal Bansal …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. H.C.Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Mr. Ashwani Chawla, Advocate, for respondent No.2. Mr. Prashant Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Since, it is not in dispute that on account of appointment of Vice Chancellor in the respondent-University, present petition has been rendered infructuous. 2. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge July 04, 2025 (shankar) 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?