AMAR MANDAL ALIAS AMARNATH MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./306/2025 · 2025-01-23
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2381 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2381 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 306 of 2025
------ Amar Mandal @ Amarnath Mandal, aged about 43 years, S/o Madan Mandal, R/o Village –Teliyachak, P.O. –Kathikund, P.S. –Kathikund, District –Dumka, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kumar Nilesh, Advocate
: Mr. Anuj Kr. Trivedi, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Amrita Kumari, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 23.01.2025
Heard the parties. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.255 of 2024 registered under sections 132/ 351(2)/115(2)/324(2)/109(1)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons entered into the hospital, abused, assaulted and threatened Dr. Anand Kumar and also threatened to set fire to the hospital and shot him dead consequent upon death of Manju Devi, the relative of the petitioner. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the doctors and staff of the hospital in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioner be given the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Hence, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, he shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.50,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur, in connection with Pakur Town P.S. Case No.255 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case with further condition that that he will not annoy or disturb the doctors or staff of the hospital in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu/Gunjan-