APHC010001892012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 165/2012 Between: Vishvanatham Basavaraju & Another and Others Puppala China Sathiraju Another and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. BS KARTIK PRASAD ESR 2. E V V S RAVI KUMAR 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3365] TUESDAY ,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR I.A.No.01 of 2025 In/And CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 165/2012 Vishvanatham Basavaraju & Another and ...PETITIONER(S) AND Puppala China Sathiraju Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Respondent(S): BS KARTIK PRASAD ESR E V V S RAVI KUMAR [3365] THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR ...PETITIONER(S) ...RESPONDENT(S) 2 The Court made the following Order: A.T.C. No.25/2003 was held in favour of the landlords. However, in A.T.A No.6 of 2008 the order was reversed. Aggrieved by it landlords preferred the present C.R.P.No.165 of 2012. 2. The present I.A.No.1 of 2025 is filed under order XXIII Rule 1 r/w 151 CPC praying for recording the terms of compromise, as parties on both sides settled the matter outside the Court amicably. 3. Learned counsel on both sides are present. 4. Parties on both sides are physically present. 5. There is on record, the memo for terms of compromise bearing the signatures and thumb impressions respectively of the parties on both sides. The terms of compromise was read over and explained to the parties on both sides in Telugu. They admitted them to be true and correct and voluntary and they abided by terms and conditions. The substance of the compromise is to record the possession that was surrendered by the tenants in favour of the landlords and admission of possession of this property by the landlords. In compensation to it 3 Rs.30,00,000/- is to be paid, out of which the terms of compromise indicate payment of Rs.15,00,000/- by way of cheque. Today, the respondents/tenants admit that as is referred in the terms of compromise, they received remaining 15,00,000/-. Thus, the terms of compromise stood fulfilled. 6. By virtue of the above compromise, the order and judgment dated 8.7.2011 passed by the III Additional District Judge, in A.T.A No.6 of 2008 is set aside, as this civil revision petition is allowed and consequently the order passed in A.T.C 25/2003 passed by the learned Special Officer – cum – Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada stands confirmed. 7. I.A.No.01 of 2025 is allowed and the Revision is disposed of in terms of compromise. Let the decree be drafted in terms of compromise. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stands closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE DR. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR Date:18.03.2025 KKV 4 38 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DR. V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR IA.No.1/2015 and CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 165/2012 Dated 18.03.2025 KKV