APHC010336842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17054/2025 Between: 1. SRI CHINTHAPARTHY APOORVA KUMAR REDDY,, S/O.C. RAMI REDDY, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O. RIY QTS 32, RAILWAY COLONY, CHINNATHIPPASAMUDRUM, ANAMAYYA DIST, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. SUGUNAMMA,, W/O. M.MADANAMOHAN REDDY, AGED ABAOUT 36 YEARS, HINDU, RESIDING AT EDIGAPALLE, H/O. BODAVARIPALLE, PUNGANUR(M) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANAMAYYA DISTRICT(CHITTOOR). 3. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, MADANAPALLE, ANAMAYYA DISTRICT(CHITTOOR). 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, MADANAPALLE, ANAMAYYA DISTRICT (CHIITOOR). 5. R NARASIMHULU, S/O. KADIRAPPA, AGED 55 YRS, D.NO.22/8, PONNUTIPALEM VILLAGE MADANAPALLE(M) CHITTOOR 2 DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in a nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in not taking steps on the representation of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-Aof the constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to receive and process the document with respect to the property to the extent of Ac. 1.48 cents and Ac.2.78 cents(total Ac.4.36 cents) situated in Sy. No. 521/1 of B.K.Palle Village, Madanapalle Mandal by the third parties except the petitioner herein IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to issue an interim direction directing the 4th respondent not to receive and process the document with respect to the property to the extent of Ac. 1.48 cents and Ac.2.78 cents(total Ac.4.36 cents) situated in Sy. No. 521/1 of B.K.Palle Village, Madanapalle Mandal by the third parties except the petitioner herein, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. RAMINENI SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17054/2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of the India seeking the following reliefs:- “...pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in a nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in not taking steps on the representation of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21 and 300-A of the constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to receive and process the document with respect to the property to the extent of Ac.1.48 cents and Ac.2.78 cents (total Ac.4.36 cents) situated in Sy.No.521/1 of B.K. Palle Village, Madanapalle Mandal by the third parties except the petitioner herein...” 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 3. Though the petitioners made several allegations against the respondents, during hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners requested this Court, without touching the merits of the case, to issue a direction to the respondents to dispose of the representation dated 01.07.2025 filed by the petitioners. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue readily agreed to dispose of the representation dated 01.07.2025, if any pending with the respondents. 4 5. In view of the submission of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, this Court need not decide the truth or otherwise of the allegations made in the petition. This Court is conscious that no such direction be issued, in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in “The Government of India v. P.Venkatesh1”, wherein the Apex Court held that such orders may make for a quick or easy disposal of cases in overburdened adjudicatory institutions. But, they do not serve to the cause of justice. As the learned counsel for the petitioners himself requested to issue a direction to dispose of the representation dated 01.07.2025, this Court find no other alternative except to issue such direction. 6. In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to consider and dispose of the representation dated 01.07.2025 filed by the petitioners, after providing opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of three (03) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel miscellaneous application, pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 10.07.2025 SSCCHH 1 2019 (8) SCALE 544 5 201 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 17054/2025 10.07.2025 SSCCHH