BARYAM SINGH S/O Sh.Munshi Ram, v. NIPUN JINDAL AND ANR
COPC/948/2025 · 2025-09-09
Sandeep Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23807 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23807 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
COPC(T) No.948 of 2025
Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 _______________________________________________________
Baryam Singh
…….Petitioner
Versus
Sh. Nipun Jindal and another
… Respondents
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Shrutika, Advocate vice Mr. Dheeraj K. Vashishat, Advocate. ___________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral):
While placing on record copy of office order dated 08.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Regional Manager, Himachal Road Transport Corporation, Pathankot, Ms. Shrutika,
learned counsel representing the respondents, states that withdrawal order issued vide letter dated 14.08.2025 regarding regularization of service of the petitioner and pay fixation order vide letter dated 20.08.2025 have been withdrawn, as a result thereof, earlier order of regularization issued vide letter dated 12.08.2024 and pay fixation order dated 19.10.2024 stand restored.
2.
In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present proceedings and accordingly same are closed. Notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged.
(Sandeep Sharma),
Judge September 09, 2025 (shankar)
1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?