2025:HHC:31093 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 14723 of 2025 Decided on: September 11, 2025 ______________________________________________________________ Smt. Pooja Kumari ...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Ms. Babita Chauhan, Advocate vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. B.C. Verma and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ____________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General accepts notices on behalf of the respondents. 2. Before the matter could heard on merit, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that her client would be content and satisfied in case representation dated 7.5.2025 (Annexure P-2) filed by the petitioner is ordered to be decided in a time bound manner, 3. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General states that the representation, Annexure P-2, if not decided already, shall be decided expeditiously. - 2 - 4. In view of fair stand adopted by learned Additional Advocate General, present petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/competent authority to decide representation, Annexure P- 2, within a period of four weeks from today. Needless to say, authority concerned shall afford opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order thereupon. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate court of law, in case, she still remains aggrieved. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 11, 2025 (Vikrant)