IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.13618 of 2025 Decided on: 25.08.2025 Rajan Sharma ….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The limited prayer made by the petitioner in this petition is to direct respondent No.2 to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, Annexure P-1 in a time bound manner in terms of the government notification dated 20.11.2021, Annexure P-3. 3. Prayer being innocuous is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.2 to consider and decide the 2 representation of the petitioner, Annexure P-1, strictly in terms of government notification dated 20.11.2021, Annexure P-3 within six weeks from today. 5. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. ( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge August 25, 2025 (vt)