HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Main Case : Criminal Petition No. 7101 of 2025 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 02. 15.09.2025 Dr. Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa I.A.No.2 of 2025 This interlocutory application is filed under Section 528 of BNSS read with 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking extension of time granted in Crl.P.No.7101 of 2025 dated 10.07.2025. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner/Accused, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for respondent No.2/State. Perused the material on record. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that Petitioner could not secure the amount within the time frame since he is un-employee and hence, sought extension of further 15 days time for deposit of the amount. The Order dated 10.07.2025 passed in Crl.P.No.7101 of 2025 reads as under: It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is dependent on the income of his wife and is unable to comply with the direction of the learned III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kakinada, whereby the Petitioner was directed to deposit 20% of the cheque amount for complying the condition for sentence imposed on the petitioner in CC No.1784 of 2023. The said order was passed on 11.02.2025. The petitioner seeks an extension of time to comply with the said directions. 2. Considering the submission that the petitioner was unwell and also underwent medical treatment, further time of 30 days from the date of this order is 2 extended for the petitioner to comply with the directions of the learned III Additional District & Sessions Judge, Kakinada. 3. Needless to mention that failure to comply this order within the time granted, the order stands vacated. 4. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. A fair look at the above order would show that, it is a conditional order wherein, it is clearly mentioned that failure to comply this order within the time granted, the order stands vacated. It is clear that after expiry of 30 days time, Petitioner came to this Court by way of this IA seeking extension of further time, which cannot be countenanced. There are no merits in this application IA is liable to be dismissed. Accordingly, IA No.2 of 23025 is dismissed. Dr.Justice Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa Mjl /*