VEMURI SURYANARAYAN AND V.RADHA KRISHAN v. AKULA RADHA KRISHNA RAO AND 8 OTHERS
SA/865/2002 · 2025-02-03
T Mallikarjuna Rao
Original Suitbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23792 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23792 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010336152002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] MONDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 865/2002 Between: Vemuri Suryanarayan And V.radha Krishan ...APPELLANT AND Akula Radha Krishna Rao And 8 Others ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant:
1. C SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent:
1. T DURGA PRASAD RAO The Court made the following JUDGMENT:
1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellants/plaintiffs under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the
Judgment and decree, dated 20.03.1998 passed in A.S.No.117 of 1991 on the file of learned District Judge’s Court, Krishna, at Machilipatnam, reversing the
judgment and decree, dated 16.08.1991 passed in O.S.No.05 of 1985 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif Court at Machilipatnam.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of either side. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M.
3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellants despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellants are not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal.
4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO
Date:03.02.2025 MS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
SECOND APPEAL NO.865 OF 2002 Date:03.02.2025
MS