VIJAY v. UT OF J AND K TH S.H.O. POLICE STATION GANDHI NAGAR JAMMU AND ANOTHER
Crl R/19/2025 · 2025-10-17
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2379 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2379 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Crl R No. 19/2025
Vijay …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
UT of J&K and another .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Pawan Dev Singh, Dy. AG for R-1. None for R-2.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 17.10.2025
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the appellant/petitioner on the last date of hearing i.e. on 18.03.2025 and same is the position today as well. It appears that the appellant/petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant appeal which is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s).
2. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 17.10.2025 Shammi
Sr. No. 182
SHAMMI KUMAR 2025.10.17 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document