Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23787 (BOM)

Jaya Gangasagar Dattarao Dhawale and ors v. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Ltd Parbhani Through Its Divisional Controller

CA/8243/2025 · 2025-08-05

Shri Shailesh P Brahme

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

949 CA 8243 OF 2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8243 OF 2025 IN FA/698/2025 JAYA GANGASAGAR DATTARAO DHAWALE AND ORS VERSUS MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION LTD PARBHANI THROUGH ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ghatol Patil Shahaji B. Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Narayan Chavan h/f Mr. D.S. Bagul CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 05.08.2025 PER COURT : By way of this application the disbursement of the amount deposited by the respondent-Corporation is solicited. It is a death claim and the dependents are in dire need of the amount of Rs. 25,000/- towards security deposit and Rs. 1,04,78,995/-. 2. The learned advocate for the respondent-Corporation would oppose the application. He would submit that an exorbitant quantum has been sanctioned by the Tribunal. Future prospectus awarded by the Tribunal is vulnerable. 3. I have considered the rival submissions of the parties and I have also gone through the impugned judgment. A bread earner of the family is lost and precarious financial condition cannot be doubted. Instead of permitting the applicants to receive entire amount, I find it fit to restrict them to the extent of 75% only. 4. The Civil Application is partly allowed, permitting the applicants to receive 50% of the amount on furnishing undertaking and further 25% of 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:20901 949 CA 8243 OF 2025.odt the amount on furnishing surety/security to the satisfaction of the Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. Balance amount shall be invested in any nationalized bank. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) mkd/- 2/2