[2025:RJ-JP:28896] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8740/2025 Najim Khan S/o Shri Bablu Khan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Saray Gajra Kothi, Police Station Nihalganj, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present He Is Confined In Sub Jail, Hindaun). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8785/2025 Rafiq Khan S/o Jinna Khan, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Chilakhur, Police Station Angai, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. (At Present Ac- cused Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail, Hindaun City). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Asad Ul Haq Noori For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 30/07/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.250/2025 registered at Police Station Hindaun, District Karauli for the offence punishable under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. [2025:RJ-JP:28896] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8740/2025] Counsel submits that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioners are in custody since 15.06.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the fact that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity, as also considering the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners- 1.) Najim Khan S/o Shri Bablu Khan and 2.) Rafiq Khan S/o Jinna Khan shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent [2025:RJ-JP:28896] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8740/2025] dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for compliance. 10. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 11. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail applications and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J pcg/304-305