Joginder Lal vs. Seema Kashyap Cr. MP(M) No.2700 of 2024 04.01.2025 Present: Mr. Pavinder, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Ravi Patiyal, Advocate, for the respondent. Cr.MP(M) No.2700/2024 No reply is intended to be filed on behalf of the non- applicant/respondent. From the reasons and sufficient cause shown in the application, it is evident that the applicant was due diligently, bona fidely, pursuing remedies available to him under law. No inaction is attributable to the applicant on account of the explanation offered in the application for getting the delay of 102 days in filing the appeal condoned. Other than the aforesaid, in the interest of justice, delay of 102 days in filing the present criminal appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Cr.MP No._______/2025 From perusal of the grounds of appeal, it is evident that there exists an arguable case in favour of the present applicant. In view thereof and for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Leave to appeal is granted. The application stands disposed of. Cr. Appeal No._______/2025 Be registered. Records be called for. List the matter after ensuing winter vacation in the third week of March, 2025. In the meanwhile, power of attorney on behalf of the respondent be filed. ( Bipin C. Negi ) January 04, 2025 (KS) Judge