APHC010335882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17008/2025 Between: 1. TALARI RAMESH, S/O. T. RANGANATH, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE WORKS RESIDENT OF NO. 6-90, THIMMAPURAMU VILLAGE TADIPATRI MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, ANANTHAPURAM. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RURAL POLICE STATAION, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RURAL POLICE STATION, TADIPATRI, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 5. TALARI KAMALAKAR, S/O. TALARI NAGANNA, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. TIMMAPURAM VILLAGE, TADIPATRI MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6. J C NAVEEN RANGA REDDY, S/O. J.C. RAJASEKHAR REDDY AGED ABOUT MAJOR, R/O. SRINIVASAPURAM, TADIPATRI TOWN AND MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 2 7. V R VENKATESWAR REDDY, S/O. V.R. RAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT MAJOR, R/O. KANAKADRIPALLE VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDIA MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 8. SIVARAMMANNAGARI SIVA RAMI REDDY, S/O. RAJAGOPAL REDDY AGED ABOUT MAJOR, R/O. 3RD WARD, REDDIVARIPALEM VEEDHI, TADIPATRI TOWN ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ, or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in making phone calls and calling me to their police station at the instigation of unofficial respondents without any cause or registration of crime and made to sit in the police station is illegal and arbitrary and violative of fundamental rights constituted in the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents No. 3 and 4 not to call the petitioner to their police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and made to sit in the police station and pass such pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 3 & 4 not to call the petitioner to their police station without there being any crime registered against the petitioner and made to sit in the police station pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Hon’ble court, and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G M SWAMULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for respondents 1 to 4. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is being troubled by the respondents 3 and 4 at behest of respondents 5 to 8. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader, on instructions, submits that, the police have not called the petitioner to the police station and that the police would not call the petitioner without any rhyme or reason. 4. Be that as it may, the respondents 3 and 4 are hereby directed not to disturb the peace of the petitioner, without following due process of law. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 6. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 09.07.2025 BMS