[2025:RJ-JP:31086] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5487/2021 1. Mukesh Kumar S/o Shri Manna Ram, Aged About 25 Years, Resident Of Godala Ki Dhani, Gaon, Gram Sewar, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Mannalal Jat S/o Bhooraram, Aged About 55 Years, Resi- dent Of Godala Ki Dhani, Gaon, Gram Sewar, Police Sta- tion Kardhani, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Smt. Galku Devi W/o Shri Mannaram, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Godala Ki Dhani, Gaon, Gram Sewar, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Manju Devi D/o Shri Manna Ram, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Godala Ki Dhani, Gaon, Gram Sewar, Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Babulal Jat S/o Shri Ram Gopal, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of Nitharwalo Ki Dhani, Ghegha, Bagru, Jaipur (West), Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, Add.GA Mr. Tarun Jain, Adv. for respondent No.2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR Order 11/08/2025 1. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., the accused-petitioners have approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.130/2021 registered at Police Station Kardhani, Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 323 & 307 of IPC. [2025:RJ-JP:31086] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-5487/2021] 2. Learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the factual report dated 07.05.2025, which is taken on record. 3. As per the report, after investigation in FIR No.130/2021 offences punishable under Sections 498-A and 406 of IPC have been proven against the petitioners. 4. Today, petitioner No.1-Mukesh Kumar, his wife-Jyoti and complainant/respondent No.2-Babulal are personally present before this Court and have been duly identified by their respective counsel. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of both the parties submit that in this matter compromise has been arrived at between the parties and also the family dispute regarding divorce has been resolved by way of filing application under Section 13-B of Hindu Marriage Act, therefore, nothing remains in this case and FIR No.130/2021 be quashed and set aside on the basis of compromise. 6. This Court also interacted with Jyoti, who is the aggrieved party and has also submitted that in this case both the parties have arrived at compromise and has no objection if the FIR No.130/2021 is quashed. Copy of the deed of compromise is annexed with the petition. 7. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 8. In view of the aforesaid and considering the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes amicably and also considering that the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) [2025:RJ-JP:31086] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-5487/2021] 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, the FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties, although the offences are non- compoundable. 9. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and FIR No.130/2021 registered at Police Station Kardhani, District Jaipur (West) is quashed and set aside and all other proceedings arising out thereof are also quashed. Consequence to follow. 10. The stay application also stands disposed of. (ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J Mohita /55