1 2025:CGHC:23639 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3875 of 2025 1 - Narsingh Nagesh S/o Shri Sujan Ram Nagesh Aged About 53 Years Posted As Headmaster, At Govt. Primary School Salhe Bhatta, Block Mainpur, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 2 - Bholeswar Kashyap S/o Shri Keshaw Ram Kashyap Aged About 45 Years Posted As Headmaster, At Govt. Primary School, Payalikhand , Block Mainpur, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Purnima Kashyap W/o Shri Bholeswar Kashyap Aged About 39 Years Posted As Headmaster, At Govt. Primary School Naharpara Block Mainpur, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 4 - Laibano Ram Kharsail S/o Shri Durjan Ram Kharsail Aged About 48 Years Posted As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Pipalkhunta Block Mainpur, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 5 - Jeevan Lal Nayak S/o Shri Gohatiya Ram Nayak Aged About 52 Years Posted As Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. U.P.S. Dumaghat Block Mainpur District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - Lochan Ram Nagesh S/o Shri Jagat Ram Nagesh Aged About 50 Years Posted As Teacher , (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Sargiguda Block Mainpur, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Digitally signed by VEDPRAKASH DEWANGAN Date: 2025.06.13 19:08:18 +0530 2 7 - Bhooshan Singh Pande S/o Shri Nirakar Pande Aged About 40 Years Posted As Asst. Teacher , (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School Potapara Block Mainpur, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 8 - Baijanti Diwan (Baijanti Komarra) D/o Shri Motiram Komarra Aged About 39 Years Posted As Teacher , (L.B.) At Govt. Middle School Chalnapadar Block Mainpur, District - Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Thrrough The Secretary, Department Of School Education Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Commissioner Com Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar Naya, Raipur District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Gariyaband District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Mainpur District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 7 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Gariyaband District - Gariyaband (C.G.) 8 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Mainpur District - Gariyaband (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from Case Information System) 3 For Petitioners : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms. Smita Jha, Panel Lawyer and Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 12/06/2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in WA No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 261 of 2023. 4 On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge ved