Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.1075 of 2024 Date of Decision: 25.06.2025 _______________________________________________________ Shri Mitter Dev …….Petitioner Versus H.P. Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. ….Respondent _______________________________________________________
Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Tek Chand Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Shivank Singh Panta, Advocate. ____________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): By way of present petition, petitioner has prayed for the following main reliefs:-
“i) That the Respondent may kindly be directed to sanction & release revised DCRG & Leave encashment on the revised Pay fixation (P-2) along with interest to petitioner from due date till actual date of payment in a time bound manner with all its consequential benefits.”
2.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment dated 11.01.2024 passed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in CWP No. 4427 of 2023 titled Tulsi Ram Vs. Himachal Pradesh Tourism Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors.
3. Having perused the averments contained in the petition, especially relief clause vis-à-vis judgment dated 11.01.2024 passed 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Tulsi Ram (supra), this Court finds that case of the petitioner is identical to the aforesaid case decided by coordinate Bench of this Court. Vide aforesaid judgment, coordinate Bench of this Court has already dealt with all the points raised in the instant petition and as such, respondent can be directed to decide the case of the petitioner in light of the aforesaid judgment rendered by coordinate Bench of this Court.
4. Consequently, in view of the above, the directions contained in the aforesaid judgment rendered by coordinate Bench of this Court are ordered to be made mutatis mutandis applicable in the present case for all intents and purposes. In the aforesaid terms, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending application(s), if any. p` (Sandeep Sharma), Judge June 25, 2025 (Rajeev Raturi)