216 CR-1170-2020 Date of Decision: September 10, 2025 Virender @ Bijender …Pe##oner Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present:- Mr. V.P. Sangwan, Advocate for the peoner. Mr. Gaurav Garg, AAG, Haryana. DEEPAK GUPTA , J.(Oral) By way of the impugned orders, permission was granted by the Courts below to the respondents to cut the trees from the suit land. The land in dispute was claimed by the plainff, i.e. peoner herein to be owned by him and that those trees belong to him. This Court by way of an order dated 25.02.2020, while issuing noce of moon, directed that trees in queson shall not be cut by the respondent-Department ll the next date of hearing. 2. Today, it is informed by learned counsel for the peoner that both the pares have already concluded their evidence before the trial Court and the case is now fixed for arguments. 3. In view of the aforesaid factual posion, the present peon is hereby disposed of with a direcon that the pares shall maintain status quo regarding the trees in dispute lying in the land in dispute. The trial Court shall decide the suit, which has already reached at the stage of argument, as stated by learned counsel for the peoner, at the earliest, preferably within a period of two months, without being influenced by any order of this Court. September 10, 2025 (DEEPAK GUPTA) sarita JUDGE Whether reasoned/speaking: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.09.10 19:07 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order