[2025:RJ-JP:10243] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 284/2025 Sarun S/o Shri Muneem, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Muneem Ka Bas Tan Arandaka Police Station Tijara District Alwar Presently District Khairthal Tijara (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 06/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.347/2024 registered at Police Station Raini, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 5, 6 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation or Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995. Investigating is being conducted in this matter for the offences punishable under Sections 3, 5, 6 and 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation or Temporary Migration or Export) Act, 1995. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been arrested in this case on the basis of the fact that vehicle in which bovine animals were being transported is in the name of the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:10243] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-284/2025] He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents of similar nature against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of facts and circumstances of the case; contentions advanced by counsel for the petitioner so also considering the material made available on record; absence of criminal antecedents of similar nature as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Sarun S/o Shri Muneem, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/93