Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23752 (AP)

A KANAKA RATNAM CONTRACTORS v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/16738/2025 · 2025-07-20

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010335342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 16738 OF 2025 Between: 1. A KANAKA RATNAM CONTRACTORS, rep.by its Partner A.Kanaka Ratnam, R/o 14-8-10/1, Ponnuruvari Street, Morrispet, Tenali, Guntur District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Industries and Commerce Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. 2. Andhra Pradesh State Warehousing Corporation, (A State Government Undertaking) rep.by its Managing Director, D No.55-17-3, 2nd Floor, C-13, Industrial Estate, Beside Autonagar Bus Stand, Autonagar, Vijayawada. 3. M/s R R Suppliers, rep. by its Proprietor Ramaraju Kodali, D.No.1-41, Kuchikayalapudi, Gudlavalleru Mandal, Krishna District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: KOCHIRI RAJA SHEKAR Counsel for the Respondents: A RAJENDRA BABU Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR INDUSTRIES COMMERCE 2 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri T.V. Manoj, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Kochiri Raja Shekar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner; Sri A.V.G. Madhava Rao, learned Standing Counsel for APSWC appearing for Respondent No.2 and Sri A. Rajendra Babu, learned Counsel for the Unofficial Respondent No.3 and Ms.M. Anusha, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Industries. 2. Sri A.V.G. Madhava Rao, learned Standing Counsel for APSWC appearing for Respondent No.2 has submitted the Written Instruction furnished by the Deputy Manager, A.P State Ware Housing Corporation (Respondent No.2). Copy of it is also supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner. The same is taken on record. Learned Standing Counsel would submit that the Tender has been processed and the contract has been awarded in favour of the Respondent No.3 vide Agreement dated 05.07.2025. 3. Sri A. Rajendra Babu, learned Counsel representing Unofficial Respondent No.3 confirms this position that the Agreement is also entered into. 4. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, after having learnt about the subsequent development, had taken instructions to the effect that the present Writ Petition is sought to be withdrawn with liberty to challenge the award of contract granted in favour of Unofficial Respondent No.3. 5. Request granted. 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the award of contract granted in favour of Unofficial Respondent No.3, if so advised. No Order as to Costs. 3 7. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this Order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 21.07.2025 JKS 4 42 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 16738 OF 2025 21.07.2025 JKS