Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23743 (RAJ)

SHAGUFTA NAQVI D/O SH. ATA HAIDER NAQVI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10277/2025 · 2025-07-14

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26102] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10277/2025 Shagufta Naqvi D/o Sh. Ata Haider Naqvi, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Near Telephone Exchange, Kanchan Flour Mill, Dholabhata, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur -302005. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary Education, Ajmer. 4. The Managing Committee, Through Secretary, Aryan Senior Secondary School, Dholabhata, Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Goyal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 14/07/2025 1. Petitioner has invoked writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to correct her date of birth in service record/ book from 08.07.1965 to 18.06.1969 and consequently, has prayed to deferred her retirement w.e.f. 31.07.2025 to 30.06.2029. 2. Counsel for petitioner submits that the date of birth of petitioner, indicated in her service record viz 08.07.1965, is incorrect. Her correct and true date of birth is 18.06.1969, which is reflected in her birth certificate, transfer certificate etc. [2025:RJ-JP:26102] (2 of 2) [CW-10277/2025] 3. In the opinion of this Court, petitioner is required to produce evidence and to prove the documents, in order to establish that date of birth indicated in the service record/ book is incorrect and her correct date of birth is 18.06.1969. Petitioner is required to seek relief of declaration in this respect from the Civil Court. Hence, in that view, counsel for petitioner, without invoking writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach before the Civil Court, having jurisdiction to seek declaration of correction. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not press with the liberty as prayed for. 5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/16