JAGAN JOSH v. STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
CRL MP/3117/2025 · 2025-03-10
Sunder Mohan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23741 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23741 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.M.P.No.3117 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.2125 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Crl.M.P.No.3117 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.2125 of 2025 Jagan Josh ...Petitioner/Accused Vs. The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, W-19, All Women Police Station, Adayar, Chennai. (Crime No.10 of 2022)
...Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to modify the condition imposed by the this Court in Crl.O.P.No.2125 of 2025 in para 4 that “accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties (out of which, one of the sureties should be the blood related surety of the petitioner) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai, dated on 29.01.2025 pending before this Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Sitchick Page No.1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.M.P.No.3117 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.2125 of 2025 For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER The petitioner seeks modification of the condition that directs the petitioner to produce one surety who is a blood relative imposed by this Court in para no. 4 in Crl.O.P.No. 2125 of 2025 dated 29.01.2025.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that though the
order was passed on 29.01.2025, the petitioner is unable to execute the sureties, and still he is languishing in jail because he does not have a blood relative to be offered as surety.
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that the final report has also been filed.
4. This Court is of the view that considering the fact that the final report has been filed and the fact that the petitioner is still languishing in jail in spite of the bail order, the said condition can be modified as follows:
“4. Having heard the ............accordingly, the petitioner Page No.2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.M.P.No.3117 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.2125 of 2025 is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties (both sureties should be local residents) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the IX Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Saidapet, Chennai, and on further condition that:
5. Further, time to furnish surety is extended by a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. Accordingly, the criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered, and the condition is modified.
10.03.2025
dk To 1.The Inspector of Police, W-19, All Women Police Station, Adayar, Chennai.
SUNDER MOHAN, J. dk Page No.3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.M.P.No.3117 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.2125 of 2025
2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai. Crl.M.P.No.3117 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.2125 of 2024 10.03.2025 Page No.4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis