2025:HHC:29107 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13845 of 2025 Decided on: 28.08.2025 Rahul Kumar and another … Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioners : Mr. Naveen Kumar Dass, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpender Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Having heard learned Counsel for the petitioners, this petition is disposed of with the observations that if the petitioners do have any threat perception from any person, then they may approach the appropriate Police Authority, with appropriate application because in this writ petition, in the absence of any such application having been filed to the authority concerned and in the absence of any individual having been impleaded as party- respondent who is threatening them, this Court is of the considered view that no mandamus, as prayed for, can be issued. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:29107 The writ petition stands disposed of in above terms, so also, pending miscellaneous applications, if any. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge August 28, 2025 (narender)