1 2025:CGHC:45584-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1719 of 2023 Gopichand Krishnani S/o Dr. H.S. Krishnani Aged About 54 Years R/o Opposite Holy Cross School, Byron Bazaar, Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Home, Secretariat, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Station House Officer Police Station, Civil Lines, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - PNB Housing Finance Limited Through The Then / Present Officer Shri Lokesh Mahure, Working As Bank Manager, PNB Housing Finance Ltd. Raipur, C.G. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr.Raza Ali, Advocate For Respondents No.1 and 2/State : Mr.S.S.Baghel, Deputy Government Advocate Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Bidhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 8.9.2025 1. Heard Mr.Raza Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr.S.S.Baghel, learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Digitally signed by BABLU RAJENDRA BHANARKAR Date: 2025.09.08 17:52:20 +0530 2 for respondents No.1 and 2/State. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer :- “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and in exercise thereof admit the petition, call for the records and after hearing the parties in the matter, quash the entire criminal proceedings in Criminal Case No.2141/2017 (State vs. Vikas Jain & anr) arising out of Crime No.660/2016 registered at Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur for the offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 34 of IPC, so far as it to petitioner herein, being abuse of process of court and abuse of process of law and also in violation of petitioner’s fundamental rights and in peculiar factual matrix of case and in interest of justice.” 3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate appearing for respondents No.1 and 2/State submits that he has filed an application for taking affidavit on record and submits that supplementary charge- sheet has been filed against the petitioner. 4. Relevant portion of the affidavit states as under:- “3. That, in compliance of the Hon’ble Court’s order dated 02.09.2025, it is most humbly and respectfully submitted that, the office of the Deponent on behalf of the Investigating Officer of the subject crime number, is hereby filing the copy of the supplementary charge 3 sheet filed against the petitioner before this Hon’ble Court for its kind consideration and proper adjudication of the instant petition, copy whereof, is being annexed herewith as ANNEXURE R/1 for kind perusal of this Hon’ble Court. 4. That, the Deponent herein is duty bound to adhere and comply with the direction issued by this Hon’ble Court from time to time and it shall be his most sincere endeavour to ensure implement action with the coordination of the Police Officials as early as possible. 4. That, the Deponent has highest regards to the directions passed by the Hon’ble Court from time to time and as and when, any further direction be made by the Hon’ble Court, the same will be complied with in its true spirit.” The affidavit is taken on record. 5. In view of above, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to law against the supplementary charge-sheet. 6. Permission is granted. 7. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to law against the supplementary charge- sheet. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Bablu