Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23735 (CHH)

SMT. DURGAWATI SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2087/2020 · 2025-04-11

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:17030 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2087 of 2020 • Smt. Durgawati Sahu W/o Shri Surendra Sahu Aged About 30 Years President Of Mateshwari, Women Self Help Group Kailashpur/ Assistant Seller Of Govt. Fair Price Shop Kailashpur, Village Kailashpur, Block Ramanujnagar, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Food And Civil Supply, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. The Collector (Food Department) Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Surajpur, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh 4. The Food Inspector Ramanujnagar, District : Surajpur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Ms. Akansha Vishwakarma, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. A.N. Pandey, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shubham Bajpai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 11/04/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to set aside of the impugned order dated 13.8.2020 ANNEXURE P/1 issued by the respondent No. 3 and impugned advertisement order dated 13.8.2020 ANNEXURE P/2 issued by respondent No.3. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No. 3 to allow to continue of the petitioner Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 group for running the fair price shop of village – Kailashpur Block- Ramanujnagar Distt- Surajpur (C.G.) as per allotment order dated 5.9.2013. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire record in respect of cancellation of fair price shop of petitioner. 10.4 Any other relief or reliefs may also be granted to the petitioner which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Ms. Akansha Vishwakarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instruction. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti