Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23733 (KAR)

SRI UDAY K M v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER

WP/12866/2021 · 2025-01-17

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1975 WP No. 12866 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 12866 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. UDAY.K.M. S/O MADAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, NO.4 /204, 2ND FLOOR, VISHAL PALACE, 1ST CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560 003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAHUL REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. N.N.DAMODAR., ADVOCATE) AND: THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, M/S ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY (INDIA) LTD., THE RUBY, 10TH FLOOR, 29, SENAPATI BAPAT MARG, DADAR (WEST), MUMBAI-400 028. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SHETTY VIGNESH SHIVARAM., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1975 WP No. 12866 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Sri.Rahul Reddy., counsel on behalf of Sri.N.N.Damodar., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 70