Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23724 (CHH)

ADITYA MAHILANGE @ RAJA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1711/2025 · 2025-06-10

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:23057 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1711 of 2025 Aditya Mahilange @ Raja S/o Chhotelal Mahilange Aged About 22 Years R/o Manjhwapara, Rajiv Gandhi Chowk, Police Station - Civil Line, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Station House Officer, Police Station - Civil Line, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent For Petitioner : None For Respondent/State : Mr. Nitansh Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 11.06.2025 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 02.07.2024, passed in MCRC No. 4700 of 2024, while rejecting the bail to the petitioner, namely, Aditya Mahilange @ Raja, had expressed its trust that the trial Court should make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of the order, if there was no legal impediment. KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 3. Earlier on one occasion also, this Court had granted extension of time for compliance of the order dated 02.07.2024. 4. The learned Special Judge (NDPS Act), Bilaspur, District – Bilaspur (C.G.) through the District and Sessions Judge, Bilaspur (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 08.05.2025 has requested for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the PUD, that the present case is at the stage of recording of the prosecution witness, and a total of 10 prosecution witnesses have been examined and 5 prosecution witnesses are yet to be examined. Hence, trial is likely to take some time for its conclusion. Hence, he prays for grant of some more time for concluding the trial. 6. The request appears to be reasonable. The concerned trial Court is directed to conclude the trial as early as possible, preferably within a further period of three months from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal