[2025:RJ-JP:23288] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 281/2025 Neeraj S/o Satyavir, R/o Village Unhani, Tehsil Kanina, Police Station Kanina, District Mahendragarh (Haryana). (At Present The Accused Confined At Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogendra Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-Cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG None present for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Order 17/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the peti- tioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.157/2024 registered at Police Station Bajaj Nagar, Jaipur City (East), for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 4, 5 of the Prize Chits and Money Cir- culation Scheme (Banning) Act, 1978 and Sections 3, 21 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is an employee of company, he is in custody since 23.12.2024 and the charge-sheet has already been filed against him. He further submits that offences levelled against the peti- tioner are triable by Magistrate, the trial of the case will take con- siderable time, and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:23288] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-281/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Government Advocate has opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard and considered the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, and also the fact that the charge-sheet has been filed against the petitioner, the petitioner is in custody since 23.12.2024, offences levelled against the petitioner are tri- able by Magistrate, the trial of the case will take considerable time and further that there is no criminal antecedent against the peti- tioner, hence, without commenting any opinion on the merits/de- merits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail appli- cation. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner Neeraj S/o Satyavir shall be re- leased on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipula- tion that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in other offence(s) of similar nature during currency of the bail and he [2025:RJ-JP:23288] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-281/2025] shall mark his presence in first week of every two months in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J Seema/13