[2025:RJ-JP:32288] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11089/2025 1. Padam Kanwar Wife Of Late Ghanshyam Singh @ Pawan, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 2. Bhanu Pratap Singh Son Of Late Ghanshyam Singh @ Pawan, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 3. Lakshya Pratap Singh Son Of Late Ghanshyam Singh @ Pawan, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Jujhar Singh Son Of Joga Singh, Resident Of Khedi Dawal, Police Station Gula, District Kaithal, Haryana (Driver Truck No. Pb-11-Cl-3261). 2. Pravesh Kumar Son Of Shyam Lal Agarwal, Resident Of Ward No. 8, Punjabi Bagh, Samna, District Patiyala, Punjab (Owner Truck No. Pb-11-Cl-3261). 3. United India Insurance Company Limited, Branch Office At Devipura Sikar Through Its Manager (Insurance Company Truck No. Pb-11-Cl-3261) 4. Tauf Kanwar Wife Of Shri Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 80 Years, Resident Of Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar. 5. Bhanwar Singh Son Of Ram Singh, Aged About 85 Years, Resident Of Village Dujod, Tehsil Dhod, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinay Mathur, Adv. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 18/08/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the investigating officer's presence is mandatory while dismissal of [2025:RJ-JP:32288] (2 of 2) [CW-11089/2025] application filed by the petitioner. It is further submitted that the statements were recorded under duress and influence. Having heard and upon perusal of the submissions made before the learned trial Court, the relevant extract of which is reproduced herein below: “ अप्रार्थी सं. 3 की ओर से दिये गये तक सही है दिक प्रर्श एनए 1 बयान अन्तगत धारा 161 सीआरपीसी गजेन्द्रदिसंह ए.ड. 2 के है, दिजसने दिजरह की साक्ष्य में उक्त बयानों को पुदि'स द्वारा उसकी मज से दि'ये जाना स्वीकार दिकया गया है। ऐसी परिरस्थि.दित में उक्त बयानों की सत्यतता के दि'ए अनुसंधान अदिधकारी की त'बी अनावश्यक प्रतीत होती है। प्रार्थीनापत्र बहस अंदितम के प्रक्रम पर प्रस्तुत दिकया गया है, जो प्रकरण के ेरी ना करने की गज से पेर्श करने से इंकारी नहीं की जा सकती है। प्रकरण टारगेटेड कै सेज की श्रेणी में है।" This Court is of a view that the matter is of targeted case and is in its final stage, therefore, at this juncture no interference from a writ Court is warranted. In view of the above and taking note of the extract reiterated hereinabove, the present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /51