IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 13464 of 2025 Date of decision : 26.8.2025. Tanu Kumari ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & others ...Respondents. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Shreya Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Anup Ratten, Advocate General with Mr. Vishwadeep Sharma, Addl. A.G., for respondents No. 1 and 2. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record a copy of order issued by the Director of School Education, according to which, the petitioner has been adjusted and hence, her grievance has been sorted out in this manner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of above, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of accordingly. In view of the statement so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of having been rendered infructuous. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (Satyen Vaidya) 26th August, 2024 Judge (kck) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2-