Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20719 RFA No. 535 of 2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 535 OF 2016 (MON) BETWEEN:
SHRI. ABHILASH S/O SHRI DAMODAR, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT NO.22-A, POLARIS BLOCK, AQUILA HEIGHTS, NO.27, HMT FACTORY MAIN ROAD, NEXT TO HMT SCHOOL, BANGALORE. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. CHANBASAPPA.S.N., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
GAJANANA ENTERPRISES A PARTNERSHIP FIRM REGISTERED UNDER INDIAN PARTNERSHIP ACT, HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT NO.30-B, XVI MAIN ROAD, IV BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-560 034.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER.
SHRI M.A.NAIK. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. ANUP DEVARAJA., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. G.B.SHARATH GOWDA., ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20719 RFA No. 535 of 2016
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the appellant is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 05.06.2025. On that day, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the appellant, the appeal was ordered to be listed on 17.06.2025. The appeal is listed today for appearance of counsel for the appellant. As already noted above, when the case is called, the appellant is not represented. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. In view of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5