IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.17341 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-426 Year-2024 Thana- RIGA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1. Ram Udar Singh Son of Ram Chandra Singh Resident Of Village- Jay Nagar, Ps- Riga, Dist- Sitamarhi 2. Ram Narayan Singh son of Ram Chandra Singh Resident Of Village- Jay Nagar, Ps- Riga, Dist- Sitamarhi 3. Mukesh Singh son of Raj kishor singh Resident Of Village- Jay Nagar, Ps- Riga, Dist- Sitamarhi 4. Raj Kishor Singh son of Nathuni Singh Resident Of Village- Jay Nagar, Ps- Riga, Dist- Sitamarhi 5. Jay Narayan Singh son of Babaji @ Nandkishor Singh Resident Of Village- Jay Nagar, Ps- Riga, Dist- Sitamarhi 6. Bablu Kumar Son of Raj kishor Singh Resident Of Village- Jay Nagar, Ps- Riga, Dist- Sitamarhi 7. Santosh Kumar son of Raj kishor singh Resident Of Village- Jay Nagar, Ps- Riga, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the State : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 02-04-2025 Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Dr. Indiwar Kumari, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 426 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 09.12.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 192, 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17341 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 2/4 3. According to prosecution case, all the petitioners came to the informant armed with with iron rod, sword, farsa and started abusing and assaulting the informant. When some people came to save the life of the informant, all accused persons also assulted them. It is further alleged that one co- accused person snatch Rs.5000/- from the pocket of one Bindu Rai. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have clean antecedent and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that there is case and counter case. Although, petitioners are named in the FIR, but from the perusal of the FIR, it appears that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners. There is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including the petitioners. It is further submitted that although, the informant side has received the injuries but injury report of the informant side suggest that all injuries of the injured persons are simple in nature. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, clean antecedents of the petitioner and the fact that there is case Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17341 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 3/4 and counter case between the parties and injuries of the injured persons of the informant side are simple in nature, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Sitamarhi in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 426 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/ 482(2) of the BNSS, 2023 and with other following conditions:- i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.17341 of 2025(2) dt.02-04-2025 4/4 criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. priyanka/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T