The Visakha Petro Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd., 39-2-20 v. The Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Port Area
WA/983/2010 · 2025-07-21
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23704 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23704 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010334922010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADE3H AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JULY^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPAT)^ WRIT APPEAL NO: 983 OF 2010 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 31.8.2010 in WP.No. 19360 of 2006 on the file of High Court. Between: The Visakha Petro infrastructure Pvt.Ltd., 39-2-20, Vishnu Vardhanapuram Labbipet, Vijayawada rep., rep.by its Chairman & Director ...APPELLANT AND The Visakhapatnam Port, Trust Port Area, Visakhapatnam rep., by its Chairman. The Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Limited, Petroleum House, 17 Jamsedji Tata Road, Mumbai-20 rep., by its Chairman. The Government of India, Ministry of Surface Transport, rep., by its PrI. Secretary. 1. 2. 3. ...RESPONDENTS^
\W/ lA NO: 2 OF 2010(WAMP 2232 OF 2010) Petition under Section 151^PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1®' respondent not to allot the land in question to anybody, pending disposal of the writ appeal. ^ lA NO: 1 OF 2011(WAMP 174 OF 2011K Between: The Visakhapatnam Port Trust, Port Area, Visakhapatnam rep., by its Chairman. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT No.1 AND The Visakha Petro Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd., 39-2-20, Vishnu Vardhanapuram, Labbipet, Vijayawada rep., rep.by its Chairman & Director. 1. ...RESPONDENT/APPELLANT The Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Limited, Petroleum House, 17 Jamsedji Tata Road, Mumbai-20 rep., by its Chairman. The Government of India, Ministry of Surface Transport, rep., by its PrI. Secretary. 2. 3. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim direction granted on 26.11.2010 made in WAMP No.2232 of 2010"in WA No. 983 or2010 pending disposal of the Writ Appeal. ^
.t - ■•V' & it- Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. R. PRABHAKAR(Not Preseng Counsel for the Respondent No.1 :SRI P. SRI RAM Counsel for the Respondent No.2:SREEKANTH REDDY AMBATI ^ Counsel for the Respondent No.3:THE DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL^ OF INDIA The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
APHC010334922010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Sr.No:-3 [3483] AT AMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 983 of 2010 f The Visakha Petro Infrastructure Pvt.Ltd., 39-2-20, Vishnu Vardhanapuram, Labbipet, Vijayawada, Rep. by its Chairman & Director ...Appellant Vs.
by its Chairman & Director ...Appellant Vs. The Visakhapatnam Port Trust Port and others ...Respondents -k-kifk’k’it’k'tt'tfit Advocate for Appellant; Advocate(s) for Respondent(s): NONE Mr. P Sri Ram for R.1 Mr. Sreekanth Reddy Ambati for R.2
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 22"'* July, 2025 DATE P C : None for the appellant. Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. The Writ Appeal is accordingly dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M.RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri K. R. Prabhakar, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to the Deputy Solicitor General of India, High CourLof A.P. [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri Sreekanth Reddy Ambati, Advocate [OPUC]--^
4. One CC to Sri P. Sri Ram, Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies ssb
.M HIGH COURT DATE0:22/07/2025
JUDGMENT WA No.983 OF 2010 I 12 AUG 2m B i^Currenisecon •# DISMISSING THE W.A. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS / V