Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23699 (HP)

TRIPTA DEVI v. ASHWANI KUMAR

FAO(FC)/45/2024 · 2025-07-22

Sushil Kukreja, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:HHC:23895 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA FAO (FC) No. 45 of 2024 Decided on: 22.07.2025 ______________________________________________________________ Tripta Devi ....Appellant Versus Ashwani Kumar …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Vivek Singh Thakur,  Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja,  Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant       : Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate. Appellant Tripta Devi present in person. For the respondent    : Mr. Rakesh Chaudhary and Mr. Panku Chaudhary, Advocates. Respondent Ashwani Kumar present in person. Vivek Singh Thakur, Judge (oral) Parties in lis are husband and wife. 2. Wife­Tripta   Devi   has   assailed   judgment   and decree dated 16.09.2024 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court,   Kangra   at   Dharamshala   in   case   No.   420/2020, titled Ashwani Kumar Vs. Tripta Devi, whereby, petition for dissolution   of   marriage   by   a   decree   of   divorce   filed   by husband has been allowed by the Family Court. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? ( 2025:HHC:23895 ) 3. During pendency of present appeal, keeping in view   the   nature   of   relation   and   dispute   between   the parties,   as   prayed   by   them,   matter   was   referred   for mediation to Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate. 4. In mediation, matter has been amicably settled between the parties, as reported by learned Mediator by submitting his report. 5. Today, parties are present in person and their separate statements, on oath, have been recorded. 6. Sh. Ashwani Kumar has deposed as under:­ “My   marriage   with   appellant   Tripta   Devi   was solemnized on 22.02.2008, however, date of marriage in   the   impugned   judgment   has   been   mentioned wrongly as 22.08.2008. Out of this wedlock, we have been   blessed   with   two   children   namely   Aditya   and Kritika. Our family is residing in six rooms house. Two rooms are in occupation and possession of Tripta Devi and four rooms are in occupation and possession of my parents. I am also staying with my parents. However, children are residing with us i.e. with me as well as Tripta Devi and they roam freely in all the six rooms. We are having separate two washrooms (toilets and bathrooms) and two kitchens. One set is for the use of Tripta  Devi   and   another  set   for  use  of  my   parents. Children   are   using   any   of   the   washrooms independently as per their wish. I have filed petition for dissolution of marriage, which has been allowed by the Family Court. During pendency of the present appeal, the matter has been amicably settled. I and my family have agreed to allow Tripta Devi to continue to stay in two rooms and to have occupation and possession of separate kitchen and   washroom   (toilet   and   bathroom). I   have   also agreed to allow her to use electricity connection and water   connection   of   our   family   without   paying   any 2 ( 2025:HHC:23895 ) charges. I am also agree to enhance the maintenance amount of Rs. 2600/­ @  10% after every three years and in case there is any serious disease or problem faced   by   Tripta   Devi   in   future,   then,   as   per   my capability and capacity, I will try my best to help her. The   aforesaid   arrangement   shall   continue   during lifetime  of Tripta Devi or till she is re­married. I shall be   transferring   the   amount   of   maintenance   to   the account of Tripta Devi on or before 7th of every month. In turn, Tripta Devi has agreed to dissolve marriage with mutual consent without going into the merits of the petition filed by me for dissolution of marriage. All other   litigations   pending   between   the   parties   except execution petition for arrears of maintenance, if any, shall also stand disposed of in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. I have also undertaken to  bear the  expenses  of  bringing  up of our  children including their education. I have agreed to resolve the dispute amicably before the Mediator as well as in this Court. I have deposed in the Court out of my free will, consent and without any coercion or external pressure of any kind.” 7. Smt. Tripta Devi has deposed as under:­ “I have heard the statement of Ashwani Kumar and endorse   the   same   to   be   true   and   correct. I   have deposed in the Court out of my own free will, consent and without any coercion or external pressure of any kind.” 8. In view of above amicable settlement between parties, impugned judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage   is   modified   to   the   extent   that   now   marriage between parties is dissolved with mutual consent of the parties in terms of the compromise referred supra and as also narrated in the statements of parties. Rest impugned judgment   and   decree   shall   remain   as   it   is. As   such, 3 ( 2025:HHC:23895 ) respondent   Ashwani   Kumar   shall   pay   monthly maintenance @ Rs. 2,600/­ per month from 01.07.2025 to appellant Tripta Devi with 10% increase after every three years during her lifetime or till her re­marriage. Appellant Tripta Devi shall also be entitled for arrears of maintenance @ Rs. 2,000/­ per month from 01.08.2020 till 30.06.2025, if not already paid. Respondent Ashwani Kumar shall also pay regular maintenance @ Rs. 2,000/­ per month each to his son Aditya till he completes his education and starts earning and to his daughter Kritika till her marriage or she starts earning, apart from education and medical expenses from 01.08.2020. 9. Deposition   of   parties   shall   form   part   of   the decree. 10. Report of learned Mediator shall form record of appeal. 11. Before parting, we would like to record words of appreciation for learned Mediator Mr. G.D. Verma, Senior Advocate for his earnest efforts for materializing settlement and also for learned counsel for the parties, whose active cooperation has resulted into happy ending of litigation. 12. Decree, in aforesaid terms, be prepared. 4 ( 2025:HHC:23895 ) 13. Appeal stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. Pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of. ( Vivek Singh Thakur ) Judge ( Sushil Kukreja ) July 22, 2025 Judge (raman) 5