Sri. Reddy Srinivasa Reddy, v. The State of Andhra. Pradesh,
WP/22193/2020 · 2025-09-02
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23699 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 23699 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010335582020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION Between:
1. Sri. Reddy Srinivasa Reddy,, S/o.Sri Reddy Subbareddy, aged about 54 years, Occ Business,
R/o.H.No.4 Tadepalligudam, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by lame Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh. 2. The Station House Officer, , Tadepalligudam Rural Police Station, Tadepalligudam, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Sri Reddy Damodara Reddy, S/o. Lat 61 years, Occ Retd. Doctor, R/o.H.No.4 West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22193 OF 2020
1. Sri. Reddy Srinivasa Reddy,, S/o.Sri Reddy Subbareddy, aged about 54 years, Occ Business,
R/o.H.No.4-51 Tadepalligudam, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, I lame Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur, Andhra
2. The Station House Officer, , Tadepalligudam Rural Police Station, Tadepalligudam, West Godavari District, Andhra
3. Sri Reddy Damodara Reddy, S/o. Late Kati Reddy, aged about 61 years, Occ Retd. Doctor, R/o.H.No.4-51 -2/1, Tadepalligudam, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
1. Sri. Reddy Srinivasa Reddy,, S/o.Sri Reddy Subbareddy, aged 51-2/1, ...Petitioner its Principal Secretary, I lame Department, Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur, Andhra
2. The Station House Officer, , Tadepalligudam Rural Police Station, Tadepalligudam, West Godavari District, Andhra e Kati Reddy, aged about 2/1, Tadepalligudam,
2
4. Sri Muppidi Krishna Kishore Reddy, S/0,M.Venkataram Reddy, C/o.Purushotarn Reddy aged about 45 years, Om Cultivation, Rio.Veerampalem (V),Tadepalligudam, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh. 5. Sri Kondlle Srinivas, S/o. Sri Veeraraju, aged about 40 years, Om Laborer, Rio. Veerampalem village, Tadepalligudam, West Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh.
...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in calling the petitioner and his family members to Police Station and interfering in civil disputes relating to the suit property of 0.S.No.156 of 2017 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari and threatening the petitioner with false cases including S.Cs and S.Ts (POA) Act, 1989 through the Respondent No 5 if not compromise with Respondent No.3 to 5, as illegal, unjust, unfair, in violation of principles of natural justice, violative of the Fundamental Right guaranteed under Articles 14 and the Constitutional Right guaranteed under Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 not to interfere in civil disputes of property admeasuring Ac,5-28 Cei6 in R.S.No.326/1 and and Ac.1-50 Cents out of Ac.2- 12 in R.S,No,121/2B situated at Veerampalem village, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari and pass
3
IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct Respondent No.2 not interfere with of property admeasuring Ac.5-28 Cents in R.S.No.326/1 and Ac.1-50 Cents out of Ac.2-12 in R.S.No.121/2B situated at Veerampalem village, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari or call the petitioner to Police Station and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: SRINIVAS BASAVA Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondents:. Counsel for the Respondents: T.V.JAGGI REDDY The Court made the following order:
4
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22193 OF 2020
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“....pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 in calling the petitioner and his family members to Police Station and interfering in civil disputes relating to the suit property of 0.S.No.156 of 2017 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari and threatening the petitioner with false cases including S.Cs and S.Ts (POA) Act, 1989 through the Respondent No 5 if not compromise with Respondent No.3 to 5, as illegal, unjust, unfair, in violation of principles of natural justice, violative of the Fundamental Right guaranteed under Articles 14 and the Constitutional Right guaranteed under Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 not to interfere in civil disputes of property admeasuring Ac,5-28 Cei6 in R.S.No.326/1 and and Ac.1-50 Cents out of Ac.2-12 in R.S,No,121/2B situated at Veerampalem village, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari and pass..”
2. Heard Sri Srinivasa Basava, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are interfering in the civil dispute and calling the petitioners to the police station.
4. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that in the light of the interim orders dated 26.11.2020, no further orders are required to be passed in this matter.
5
5. As can be seen from the interim order dated 26.11.2020, this Court directed the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute between the petitioner and unofficial respondents Nos.3 to 5.
6. In that view, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date:03.09.2025 KKV
6
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.22193 of 2020
Dt.03.09.2025
KKV