Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23698 (JHR)

VIKASH KUMAR VISHWAKARMA v. LAXMI DEVI

Cr.Rev./952/2022 · 2025-02-25

Sanjay Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 952 of 2022 …. Vikash Kumar Vishwakarma, aged about 36 years, son of Deochandra Vishwakarma, resident of Village- Purnanagar, PO- Giridih, PS- Giridih (M), District- Giridih …… Petitioner Versus 1. Laxmi Devi, wife of Vikash Kumar Vishwakarma, D/O Shyam Sundar Rana 2. Sandhya Kumari, aged about 5 years, daughter of Vikash Kumar Vishwakarma (represented by her mother, Laxmi Devi), Both are resident of village- Purananagar, PO- Giridih, PS- Giridih (M), District- Giridih. At present- Village- Chhchhando, PO and PS- Bengabad, District- Giridih 3. The State of Jharkhand …… Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jitendra Pandey, A. P. P. For the O. P. No. 2 : Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate ….. 09/25.02.2025 Mr. Mohit Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present the present Criminal Revision No. 952 of 2022 as the matter has been settled between the parties by giving one time permanent alimony to the opposite party nos. 1 and 2 to the tune of Rs. 25,00,000/- as full and final settlement. 2. Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 raised no objection. 3. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this Criminal Revision No. 952 of 2022. 4. Accordingly, the instant Criminal Revision No. 952 of 2022 is dismissed as withdrawn on account of settlement between both the parties. (Sanjay Prasad, J.) Kamlesh/