Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010335242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 6953/2025 Between:
GURRAM MARTIN LUTHER, S/O LATE RAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS CAST-SC MALA, FLAT NO.29 YARLAGADDA APPARAO STREET ASHOKNAGAR- VIJAYAWADA -AP (CRL.M.P. NO. 325/2025,CRL.M.P.
NO.468 /2025 AND CRL.MP.NO.510/2025 ON THE FILE OF HONBLE SPECIAL POCSO COURT VIJYAWADA-AP ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND THE STATE ANDHRA PRADESH, rep by its Public prosecutor Through Station House officer Mahila Police Station Vijayawada- NTR District, High Court of AndhraPradesh, Amaravati,Guntur ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1.RAJESH KUMAR B Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: Order: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to
2 enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.12 of 2025 of Mahila Police Station, Vijayawada, registered against the petitioner herein for the offence punishable under Sections 65(2), 64(2) and 201 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘the BNS’) and Section 6 of the POCSO Act.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
3. In this case charge sheet is filed against the Petitioner. As seen from the report and also the statement of the victim is accusation is well founded. There are no merits in the petition. Hence, the Criminal Petition is liable to be dismissed.
4. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 21.07.2025 VTS