$~7 & 8 * IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1292/2022 VIDUSHI SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ujwal Ghai, Advocate. versus ROHAN KHOSLA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Harmeet Malhotra, Adv with petitioner in person. + CONT.CAS(C) 280/2024 ROHAN KHOSLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harmeet Malhotra, Adv with petitioner in person. versus VIDUSHI SHARMA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Tanya Sharma, and Mr. Ujwal Ghai, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 03.04.2025 CONT.CAS(C) 1292/2022 1. This contempt petition has been filed by petitioner which relates to the admission in the school of the younger daughter Reya Khosla, it is noted that, the event in question came to the knowledge of father, Rohan Khosla in 2017 itself. 2. The contempt petition has been filed in 2022, and is therefore, barred by limitation, as per counsel for Vidushi Sharma, which is refuted by counsel for Rohan Khosla. 3. Notwithstanding the respective contentions, in the opinion of this Court, this issue is irrelevant, at this stage; daughter Reya Khosla, was admitted to Pathways This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2025 at 14:25:54 School, which is a highly reputed school in the NCR and no prejudice was caused in the upkeep and the education of the daughter; in any event the issue is stale as the daughter is now pursuing a graduation degree. 4. Accordingly, petition is dismissed. CONT.CAS(C) 280/2024 1. This contempt petition has been filed alleging disobedience of the settlement deed, arrived at, between the parties, dated 23rd October 2008 and 03rd December 2008, based on which a decree was granted, on 11thDecember 2008. 2. There are some pending issues of non-compliance. 3. First, pertains to arrears, which counsel for respondent/Vidushi Sharma (wife), states that they are pursuing an execution petition before the Family Courts. 4. Second, relates to mandate that petitioner/Rohan Khosla(father) shall provide 1/3rd share of the Flat bearing no. 305, Vatika Technology Park, Gurgaon, to his daughters, Tanya Khosla and Reya Khosla respectively, on them attaining the age of 24 years. 5. Ms. Tanya Sharma, who is an Advocate of this Court is present, and states that she has crossed 24 years of age, whereas her younger sister Reya Khosla is still 19 years of age. 6. Mr. Rohan Khosla assisted by his counsel states that, the said flat has since been sold and 1/3rd sale proceeds have come to his share. 7. Considering that the elder daughter has already crossed 24 years of age, and younger daughter is 19 years of age, it would be imperative that the proceeds of 1/3rd share should be secured. 8. Accordingly, Mr. Rohan Khosla shall deposit the 1/3rd sale proceeds, within a period of six weeks, before the Registrar General of this Court, which shall be kept in an interest-bearing fixed deposit, subject to further directions of this Court. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2025 at 14:25:54 9. The sale deed of the said flat, along with statement on affidavit, detailing the proceeds which have come to his share, shall be placed on record by Mr. Rohan Khosla. A copy of the same shall be given to counsel for Ms. Vidushi Sharma. 10. List for ‘compliance’ 22nd May 2025. 11. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J APRIL 3, 2025/RK/tk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/04/2025 at 14:25:54