231 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-8224-2024 DATE OF DECISION: 11.07.2025 POONAM JAIN ALIAS PUNAM JAIN .....PETITIONER VERSUS SUNIL DHIR .....RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUMEET GOEL Present: - None. ….. SUMEET GOEL , J (ORAL) Case called out twice since morning. None has entered appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Vide order dated 21.03.2024, notice of motion was issued for 13.08.2024. It appears that the notices could not be issued for want of process fee. The irresistible conclusion that presently arises is that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the petition in hand. Dismissed for non-prosecution. (SUMEET GOEL) 11.07.2025 JUDGE Jatin Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No JATIN 2025.07.11 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document