1 2025:CGHC:22333 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3882 of 2025 1 - Jeevan Lal Jain S/o Late Siyaram Jain Aged About 58 Years Working As Lecturer (Hindi), Government High School Joba, Block And Tahsil - Kondagaon, District - Kondagaon (C.G.), R/o Village And Post - Dahikonga, Block And Tahsil - Kondagaon, District - Kondagaon (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Director Public Instruction Of Directorate, Indravati Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Kondagaon, District - Kondagaon (C.G.) 4 - The District Education Officer Kondagaon, Tahsil And District - Kondagaon (C.G.) 5 - The Block Education Officer Block - Kondagaon, Tahsil And District - Kondagaon (C.G.) 6 - The Principal Government High School Joba, Block - Kondagaon, Tahsil And District - Kondagaon (C.G.) ---- Respondents ____________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 27/05/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that respondent No.5 has wrongly rejected the application for leave vide order Annexure P-1, P-2 and P-3 dated 24.03.2025, 04.04.2025 and 28.04.2025 respectively. He contended that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to file fresh representation before BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN 2 respondent No.4 & 5 mentioning that petitioner is having leave in his account, which is also mentioned in the order Annexure P-1, P-2 and P-3. However he submits that a direction be issued to respondent No.4 and 5 to take a decision on the representation to be filed by petitioner within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, he is having no objection. 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for petitioner, this petition is disposed off with a liberty to the petitioner to file fresh representation before respondents No.4 and 5 against the order Annexure P-1, P-2 and P-3 dated 24.03.2025, 04.04.2025 and 28.04.2025 respectively and if such representation is filed by petitioner, the respondents No.4 and 5 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 4. With the aforesaid direction and observation, the instant petition stands disposed of. 5. Consequently, all the pending applications also stand disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram