Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 23682 (AP)

J.Hari Babu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/15891/2019 · 2025-07-29

Ninala Jayasurya, Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010335292019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3526] WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 15891/2019 Between: 1. J.HARI BABU, S/O J.VENKATRAYUDU, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, RETIRED ASSISTANT CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, 0/O. PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, ARANYA BHAVAN, GUNTUR. R/O. H.NO.1-48, SIVALAYAM STREET, KOTHAPETA MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENVIRONMENT, FOREST, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. 2. THE PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS, (HEAD OF FOREST FORCE) GOVERNMENT OF A.P., ARANYA BHAVAN, AGATHAVARAPADU, GUNTUR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to implement the Order dated 26-04-2018 passed in O.A. No. 764 of 2018 by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and extend the benefit granted therein to the Petitioner duly holding the action of the Respondents in not implementing the Order dated 26-04-2018 passed in O.A. No. 764 of 2018 by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad as being arbitrary, illegal, unjust and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and further be pleased to award costs to the. Petitioner in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith implement the Order dated 26-04-2018 passed in O.A. No. 764 of 2018 by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S V INDIRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR FORESTS (AP) The Court made the following: As the petitioner is pursuing the W.P No.14630 of 2023, seeking the very same relief as sought for in the present writ petition, this writ petition need not be considered and the same is, accordingly, dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA _________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date:30.07.2025 Ksj