Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2368 (UTT)

M/S SRI HARI OM TRADING COMPANY v. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

WPMS/469/2025 · 2025-02-14

Alok Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:920 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 14TH FEBRUARY, 2025 Writ Petition No. 469 of 2025 (M/S) M/s Sri Hari Om Trading Company through its Proprietor Sunil Yadav ...Petitioner Versus Punjab National Bank and Others …Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. Prasaan Dhariyal, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Vikas Pande, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondents: Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advocate. Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed with the following prayers :- “(I) Issue a writ or order in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Possession Notice dated 03.02.2025 issued by the respondent no. 1. (Annexure no. 8 to the writ petition) (II) Issue an order or direction in the nature of Mandamus to direct the respondents to enhance the CC limit of the petitioner for Rs. 3 crores. (III) Issue any other or further writ, order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. (IV)Award the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Heard Mr. Prasaan Dhariyal, learned counsel 2025:UHC:920 2 holding brief of Mr. Vikas Pande, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Siddhartha Jain, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Mr. Prasaan Dhariyal, Advocate, has requested to permit the petitioner to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal. 4. The said request has not been opposed by the respondents. 5. The present writ petition (WPMS 469 of 2025) is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty, as prayed, but in accordance with law. __________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J. Dt: 14.02.2025 Shiv/